Ready for the future? A spectacular future for all!
Solon Papageorgiou’s framework, formerly known as the anti-psychiatry.com model of micro-utopias, is a holistic, post-capitalist alternative to mainstream society that centers on care, consent, mutual aid, and spiritual-ethical alignment. Designed to be modular, non-authoritarian, and culturally adaptable, the framework promotes decentralized living through small, self-governed communities that meet human needs without reliance on markets, states, or coercion. It is peace-centric, non-materialist, and emotionally restorative, offering a resilient path forward grounded in trust, shared meaning, and quiet transformation.
In simpler terms:
Solon Papageorgiou's framework is a simple, peaceful way of living where small communities support each other without relying on money, governments, or big systems. Instead of competing, people share, care, and make decisions together through trust, emotional honesty, and mutual respect. It’s about meeting each other’s needs through kindness, cooperation, and spiritual-ethical living—like a village where no one is left behind, and life feels more meaningful, connected, and human. It’s not a revolution—it’s just a better, gentler way forward.
Dunbar's Number: Exploring the Social Limit of 150 People
Â
Â
Dunbar's number is a sociological concept proposed by Robin Dunbar, suggesting that humans can only maintain about 150 stable relationships due to cognitive limits. Dunbar's number is a sociological concept that suggests humans can only maintain stable social relationships with 150 to 250 people. The number 150 holds significant importance in human social relationships as it represents the suggested cognitive limit to the number of individuals with whom one can maintain stable relationships, known as Dunbar's number. It reflects the approximate size of a meaningful social circle that a person can effectively sustain, encompassing close friends, family members, and acquaintances. Beyond this threshold, maintaining genuine connections and meaningful interactions becomes increasingly challenging.
Dunbar's number influences the size of social circles and is relevant in workplaces where it impacts team dynamics and communication effectiveness. The cognitive limit to the number of people with whom one can maintain stable social relationships has a critical impact on community structures and organizations. It suggests that communities tend to naturally segment when they grow beyond a certain size, leading to the formation of smaller, more cohesive groups. This can lead to more efficient communication and decision-making within the organization but may also pose challenges in maintaining a sense of unity and inclusivity.
Research and studies have consistently supported Dunbar's number, which suggests that humans can only maintain stable social relationships with around 150 individuals. This theory has been validated through various anthropological, sociological, and psychological studies demonstrating the cognitive and emotional limits of human social networks. With the rise of social media, the challenges to Dunbar's number have become more apparent as people have larger digital social networks than traditional face-to-face relationships. Understanding Dunbar's number can help in designing effective team structures and communication strategies in organizations, enabling better collaboration and decision-making.
