Nations, Marriage and LGBT+

are nations and marriage and laws against LGBTQ+ individuals just concepts to impose oppression against natural human's nature?

This is a complex and sensitive question that touches on sociology, politics, and human rights. It’s important to note that views on this topic can vary greatly depending on cultural, religious, and personal beliefs.

Nations, marriage, and laws are human constructs that have evolved over time. They serve various purposes such as maintaining order, defining societal norms, and protecting rights and freedoms. However, it’s also true that these constructs can be, and have been, used to marginalize or oppress certain groups of people, including LGBTQ+ individuals in many parts of the world.

The idea that laws against LGBTQ+ individuals are a form of oppression is supported by many human rights organizations. They argue that these laws deny individuals their fundamental rights to love who they want and to express their true identities.

However, it’s also important to note that there has been significant progress in many parts of the world towards recognizing and protecting the rights of LGBTQ+ individuals. Many countries have decriminalized homosexuality and legalized same-sex marriage, and there are increasing protections against discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.

In conclusion, while some may use these constructs to impose oppression, many others are working to ensure that they are used to promote equality and protect human rights. It’s a complex issue with a lot of ongoing debate and progress. It’s always important to promote dialogue and understanding in these matters.