Yes — Solon Papageorgiou's framework of micro-utopias is explicitly both post-exploitative and post-coercive.
These are not optional features — they are structural, foundational principles baked into how the society functions.

Below is the clearest breakdown.

✅ 1. Post-Exploitative: Why Exploitation Is Structurally Impossible

In Solon Papageorgiou’s model:

There is no way for one person to profit from another’s dependency.

This eliminates the classic engines of exploitation:

No wages → no labor extraction

There is no employer–employee hierarchy because:

• All essential goods are freely provided.

• Contribution is voluntary and unquantified.

• No one needs wages to survive.

Without wage dependency, labor exploitation collapses.

No rents → no wealth extraction

Even though people can have private living spaces, there is no renting, no mortgages, and no financial leverage.
So:

• Nobody extracts passive income.

• Ownership is use-based, not profit-based.

No markets for essentials

Food, housing, healthcare, education, transport — all are commons-managed.

This eliminates:

• Price gouging

• Class stratification

• Accumulated advantage

• Debt and financial coercion

Essential needs cannot be used as bargaining chips.

No money → no accumulation → no inequality spirals

Since the framework is post-monetary:

• No one can accumulate capital.

• No one can own means of production in a monetizable way.

• Innovation is shared, not privatized.

Small-scale micro-villages (300 people) prevent power concentration

You cannot exploit people who:

• Know each other personally

• Can walk away at any time

• Make decisions by circles and consent

• Have guaranteed material support

Human-scale community structure makes exploitation mathematically hard and socially impossible.

✅ 2. Post-Coercive: Why Coercion Doesn’t Exist in This Framework

Coercion is replaced by culture, mediation, social norms, and restorative circles — never force.

No police, no courts, no jails

Because:

• Harm is addressed through mediation

• Conflicts are resolved in restorative circles

• Dangerous cases are handled through voluntary safety circles, not punishment

People are guided, not threatened.

No economic coercion

Nobody can be forced to:

• Work

• Obey

• Conform

• Serve a hierarchy

Because their survival never depends on obeying someone.

Contribution is voluntary and unmeasured

There are:

• No points

• No labor credits

• No time banking

• No rewards

• No punishments

This removes all indirect coercion (“You must do X to earn Y”).

No threats of exclusion

Everyone’s needs are guaranteed even if they:

• Contribute less

• Are ill

• Are disabled

• Are burned out

You cannot coerce people who cannot be materially threatened.

Culture replaces enforcement

Core values:

• Mutual aid

• Transparency

• Care

• Non-violence

• Consent practice

• Open dialogue

This eliminates the need for command-and-control structures.

🔍 3. The Model Is Not Just Non-Coercive — It Is Anti-Coercive

It avoids coercion not passively, but by design.

Micro-utopias:

• Keep groups small (≤300)

• Make contribution matter socially, not economically

• Prevent resource scarcity

• Ensure universal unconditional support

• Replace rules with expectations and practices

• Replace enforcement with mediation

This is not “anarchism with rules.”
It is post-coercive social engineering, relying on abundance + culture + relationship density.

🧠 4. So yes — it is post-exploitative AND post-coercive

Post-exploitative because:

• No wages

• No rents

• No monetary exchange

• No forced scarcity

• No ownership leverage

• No wealth accumulation

• No labor extraction

Post-coercive because:

• No enforcement structures

• No economic threats

• No hierarchy

• No punishment systems

• No power to force anyone

This combination is precisely what makes Solon Papageorgiou's model so radical compared to both left-wing and anarchist alternatives.
It is not anti-state or anti-market — it is post-state and post-market.